As regular readers will be aware, there was a fairly significant fish mortality episode on the lower Girvan just a few weeks ago towards the end of the very hot spell of weather. It wasn’t just the Girvan that was affected, the Stinchar at the same time suffered losses in the lower reaches. Following a fairly intensive investigation, results from the lab failed to find anything conclusive but the opinion was that environmental factors were largely responsible. There were subtle differences between the two episodes. The Girvan appeared to suffer more adult trout mortality than fry or parr or salmon for that matter while the Stinchar appeared to lose more salmon parr than anything else. All very strange.
Timed electrofish is late this year due to equipment failure however I would have held off in any case following these incidents to allow survivors to recover fully. Results from the Ayr and Doon have shown that on the whole, there are less juveniles in these rivers than last year. That doesn’t mean it’s all bad as 2012/13 was a very good spawning year but 2013/14 doesn’t appear to have been as good, possibly as a result of prolonged high water over winter and perhaps less spawning fish in the rivers as indicated by poor catch returns from 2013.
This morning we started the timed survey on the Girvan at Tairlaw in the upper river. Gordon and Fraser were with me and were both impressed by the early results. Looking back at results from last year however, the numbers were down by 58.7% of those found in 2013. Craigfad Bridge site produced a similar result, down by 56%. Although this appears to be a huge reduction, it is important to remember that there were still good numbers of fry with 93 being found at each of these sites. These numbers aren’t too bad at these sites. Had we undertaken this survey a month ago, I’m sure numbers would have been marginally better, but of course that is just conjecture. Fry do suffer massive declines during their first year. As we have found elsewhere in Ayrshire (and I also hear from further afield), results are generally well down this year.
As we progressed downstream, we found the reductions reduced slightly in the middle river. The best result came from the Merkland site as it did in 2013 but at only 43.8% of the previous total this actually meant we caught 181 fry in 5 minutes (compared to 322 in 2013). I expect that this once again, this site may produce the best result we find anywhere in Ayrshire this year, but time will tell.
Bearing in mind the fish kill in July, we approached Dailly unsure of what to expect. The incident appeared to have affected fish downstream of Dailly but no source of pollution could be pinpointed and in fact nothing toxic, infectious, viral or bacterial could be identified as a cause. Our site in Dailly village produced a reasonably good result with 21.8 fry per minute being caught. This was down on last year and by a slightly higher percentage than anywhere else so far but at 61.1% reduction, it didn’t seem significantly worse. There were large numbers of stone loach at the site.
The next site downstream was at Cairnhill Bridge where we saw many dead fish during July although few parr or fry were obvious. We caught 27 fry in the survey which was down on 2013 by 82.6%. This was a large decline and 21.5% greater than anywhere else on the river so far. We continued to Enoch where even higher numbers of fish had been found dead or dying in July. After 5 minutes we managed to catch just a single salmon parr and 1 trout fry (100% reduction for salmon fry). This was a disaster as this run normally produces many more salmon than this.
Finally we completed the timed survey at Girvan Dykes. Again this site exhibited a massive decline (93.1%) with only 6 fry netted in total.
I had previously estimated the losses in the lower river in the low thousands of fish based on what I had seen at the time. I would now revise this upwards considerably based on today’s results. We have yet to properly analyse these results but I am certain that we can see a significant difference between sites upstream of Dailly and those downstream. We will report more details as they become clear.
We heard calls for the hatchery to be rekindled following this incident and these results but it is essential to consider carefully what the implications of this action could mean. By stripping fish and rearing eggs, a hatchery can’t increase the number of eggs produced within a catchment. All that is achieved is the removal of natural selection, quite probably to the detriment of the naturally produced fish. Fish that are weaker may be kept alive by artificially boosting their viability. These fish may then be reintroduced to compete with the natural stock and may have an unfair advantage. Essentially, the same amount of eggs are produced regardless of whether a hatchery is operational or not. The risk to truly wild fish is increased. Another point worth remembering is that had any fry been produced in the hatchery last winter, they would have been stocked into the river in advance of the incident and therefore would have been just as susceptible as the wild fish. There are many aspects to this but I’d urge caution before calling for the hatchery to be restarted. Results elsewhere in the catchment show that the river is producing adequate numbers of salmon fry and compared to other Ayrshire rivers, the Girvan is consistently performing well.
We will be at the Stinchar on Monday and again examining the results closely to assess the full impact of the July incident.
Once all timed results are completed from all rivers, we will analyse results more fully and compare how each river is performing.
what is the reason there are large numbers of stone loach been recorded in both the ayr & girvan far outnumbering the salmon/seatrout fry is it water quality or is it that stone loach are hardier that salmon/seatrout/trout fry and can this cause problems in the future if the numbers keep increasing just wondering
Ian,
stone loach are not native to our rivers but were introduced many years ago as bait for salmon and trout anglers (they aren’t on the Stinchar which has traditionally been much more fly orientated). They do tolerate poorer water quality and as such are thriving on the Ayr. Their biomass may now outweigh salmon fry on the Ayr catchment which is concerning. They do compete with salmon fry for food and space but I don’t have anything to support all this yet.
The interesting point on the Girvan is that following the large scale mortality issues in July that killed many salmon and trout, these fish are all that are left in some areas. They managed to survive the conditions that killed thousands of salmonids.
More work is required on this subject but this year we have counted stone loach on the Ayr and Lugar at every electrofishing site and will look more closely at results over winter when we have time.
thank you for your reply stuart